Ich habe fail2ban installiert, um Bruteforce-Versuche für das SSH-Passwort zu verbieten. Es gibt geschäftliche Anforderungen, um die Kennwortauthentifizierung auf diesem Computer nicht zu deaktivieren.
fail2ban wurde mit demselben Kochbuch installiert, das SSH-Angriffe auf andere Computer effektiv verbietet. Es ist ein SSH-Gefängnis konfiguriert:
# service fail2ban status
fail2ban-server (pid 5480) is running...
WARNING 'pidfile' not defined in 'Definition'. Using default one: '/var/run/fail2ban/fail2ban.pid'
Status
|- Number of jail: 1
`- Jail list: ssh
Das manuelle Sperren von Benutzern funktioniert:
# fail2ban-client set ssh banip 103.41.124.46
Aber es scheint niemanden automatisch gebannt zu haben:
# cat /var/log/fail2ban.log
2014-11-20 18:23:47,069 fail2ban.server [67569]: INFO Exiting Fail2ban
2014-11-20 18:44:59,202 fail2ban.server [5480]: INFO Changed logging target to /var/log/fail2ban.log for Fail2ban v0.8.14
2014-11-20 18:44:59,213 fail2ban.jail [5480]: INFO Creating new jail 'ssh'
2014-11-20 18:44:59,214 fail2ban.jail [5480]: INFO Jail 'ssh' uses poller
2014-11-20 18:44:59,249 fail2ban.jail [5480]: INFO Initiated 'polling' backend
2014-11-20 18:44:59,270 fail2ban.filter [5480]: INFO Added logfile = /var/log/secure
2014-11-20 18:44:59,271 fail2ban.filter [5480]: INFO Set maxRetry = 6
2014-11-20 18:44:59,272 fail2ban.filter [5480]: INFO Set findtime = 600
2014-11-20 18:44:59,272 fail2ban.actions[5480]: INFO Set banTime = 300
2014-11-20 18:44:59,431 fail2ban.jail [5480]: INFO Jail 'ssh' started
2014-11-21 11:09:37,447 fail2ban.actions[5480]: WARNING [ssh] Ban 103.41.124.46
2014-11-21 11:10:32,602 fail2ban.actions[5480]: WARNING [ssh] Ban 122.225.97.75
2014-11-21 11:14:37,899 fail2ban.actions[5480]: WARNING [ssh] Unban 103.41.124.46
2014-11-21 11:15:32,976 fail2ban.actions[5480]: WARNING [ssh] Unban 122.225.97.75
2014-11-21 11:30:06,295 fail2ban.comm [5480]: WARNING Command ['ban', 'ssh', '189.203.240.89'] has failed. Received Exception('Invalid command',)
2014-11-21 11:30:33,966 fail2ban.actions[5480]: WARNING [ssh] Ban 189.203.240.89
2014-11-21 11:35:34,303 fail2ban.actions[5480]: WARNING [ssh] Unban 189.203.240.89
Dies ist beispielsweise ein Angriff /var/log/messages
, der hätte gefangen und verboten werden müssen:
Nov 21 07:51:32 my_hostname sshd[51074]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 1788 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:34 my_hostname sshd[51072]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 58285 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:35 my_hostname sshd[51076]: Failed password for invalid user admin from 122.225.109.219 port 2221 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:35 my_hostname sshd[51074]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 1788 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:37 my_hostname sshd[51072]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 58285 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:37 my_hostname sshd[51074]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 1788 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:38 my_hostname sshd[51076]: Failed password for invalid user admin from 122.225.109.219 port 2221 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:38 my_hostname sshd[51084]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 3501 ssh2
Nov 21 07:51:39 my_hostname sshd[51072]: Failed password for root from 122.225.109.219 port 58285 ssh2
Dies wird auch angemeldet /var/log/secure
:
Nov 25 16:06:40 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75769]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:06:46 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75769]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:06:48 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75778]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:06:55 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75778]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:06:57 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75780]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:03 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75780]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:05 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75793]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:12 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75793]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:13 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75797]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:21 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75797]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:22 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75803]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:28 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75803]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:29 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75809]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:36 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75809]: PAM 2 more authentication failures; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Nov 25 16:07:38 cluster-122-1413591380-db sshd[75811]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.41.124.41 user=root
Hier ist mein jail.local
:
# Fail2Ban configuration file.
#
# The configuration here inherits from /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf. Any setting
# omitted here will take it's value from that file
#
# Author: Yaroslav O. Halchenko <snip>
#
#
# The DEFAULT allows a global definition of the options. They can be overridden
# in each jail afterwards.
[DEFAULT]
# "ignoreip" can be an IP address, a CIDR mask or a DNS host
ignoreip = 127.0.0.1/8
findtime = 600
bantime = 300
maxretry = 5
# "backend" specifies the backend used to get files modification. Available
# options are "gamin", "polling" and "auto".
# yoh: For some reason Debian shipped python-gamin didn't work as expected
# This issue left ToDo, so polling is default backend for now
backend = polling
#
# Destination email address used solely for the interpolations in
# jail.{conf,local} configuration files.
destemail = root@localhost
#
# ACTIONS
#
# Default banning action (e.g. iptables, iptables-new,
# iptables-multiport, shorewall, etc) It is used to define
# action_* variables. Can be overridden globally or per
# section within jail.local file
banaction = iptables-multiport
# email action. Since 0.8.1 upstream fail2ban uses sendmail
# MTA for the mailing. Change mta configuration parameter to mail
# if you want to revert to conventional 'mail'.
mta = sendmail
# Default protocol
protocol = tcp
# Specify chain where jumps would need to be added in iptables-* actions
chain = INPUT
#
# Action shortcuts. To be used to define action parameter
# The simplest action to take: ban only
action_ = %(banaction)s[name=%(__name__)s, port="%(port)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
# ban & send an e-mail with whois report to the destemail.
action_mw = %(banaction)s[name=%(__name__)s, port="%(port)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
%(mta)s-whois[name=%(__name__)s, dest="%(destemail)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
# ban & send an e-mail with whois report and relevant log lines
# to the destemail.
action_mwl = %(banaction)s[name=%(__name__)s, port="%(port)s", protocol="%(protocol)s", chain="%(chain)s"]
%(mta)s-whois-lines[name=%(__name__)s, dest="%(destemail)s", logpath=%(logpath)s, chain="%(chain)s"]
# Choose default action. To change, just override value of 'action' with the
# interpolation to the chosen action shortcut (e.g. action_mw, action_mwl, etc) in jail.local
# globally (section [DEFAULT]) or per specific section
action = %(action_)s
#
# JAILS
#
# Next jails can inherit from the configuration in /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf.
# Enable any defined in that file jail by including
#
# [SECTION_NAME]
# enabled = true
#
# Optionally you may override any other parameter (e.g. banaction,
# action, port, logpath, etc) in that section within jail.local
[ssh]
enabled = true
port = ssh
filter = sshd
logpath = /var/log/secure
maxretry = 6
[ssh-iptables]
enabled = false
Warum funktioniert fail2ban nicht? Warum hat es den oben genannten Angreifer nicht ohne mein manuelles Eingreifen verboten?
2014-11-21 11:30:06,295 fail2ban.comm [5480]: WARNING Command ['ban', 'ssh', '189.203.240.89'] has failed. Received Exception('Invalid command',)
Zeit, sich deineaction
s anzusehen , die du rennst. Da stimmte etwas nicht.Antworten:
Der Parameter
logpath
sollte auf einen Pfad für eine Protokolldatei festgelegt werden, in dem die SSH-Versuche aufgezeichnet werden sollen. Wenn dies der Fall ist/var/log/messages
,/var/log/secure
ist dies offensichtlich falsch.Ändern Sie den
logpath
Parameter in die richtige Datei.quelle
/var/log/secure
wäre richtig für ein von Red Hat abgeleitetes System.Unter RHEL und CentOS gehen Authentifizierungsfehler entweder zu / var / log / messages oder / var / log Secure:
Standardmäßig ist sshd so konfiguriert, dass SyslogFacility auf AUTH eingestellt ist. Dies geht zu / var / log / messages. Wenn Sie / etc / ssh / sshd_config wie folgt überschreiben, wird stattdessen / var / log / Secure aufgerufen:
Ich arbeite mit Computern in der SoftLayer-Cloud, und ihre Basis-Image-Konfiguration wurde letztes Jahr irgendwann von AUTHPRIV auf AUTH geändert.
Standardmäßig hat fail2ban das folgende Gefängnis in /etc/fail2ban/jail.local:
Ich empfehle, /etc/fail2ban/jail.local ein zweites Gefängnis hinzuzufügen:
Starten Sie anschließend fail2ban neu, damit das zweite Gefängnis wirksam wird:
Ein alternativer Ansatz wäre, den sshd-Regex in /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/sshd.conf zu erweitern. Sowohl in / var / log / secure als auch in / var / log / messages sind genügend Informationen vorhanden, um IPs zu sperren. Leider kann fail2ban nicht alle Nachrichten analysieren, ohne einen alternativen regulären Ausdruck hinzuzufügen. Dies bleibt als Übung übrig.
quelle