Als «data-mining» getaggte Fragen

11
R / mgcv: Warum produzieren te () und ti () Tensorprodukte unterschiedliche Oberflächen?

Das mgcvPaket für Rhat zwei Funktionen zum Anpassen von Tensorproduktwechselwirkungen: te()und ti(). Ich verstehe die grundlegende Arbeitsteilung zwischen den beiden (Anpassen einer nichtlinearen Wechselwirkung vs. Zerlegen dieser Wechselwirkung in Haupteffekte und eine Wechselwirkung). Was ich...

r gam mgcv conditional-probability mixed-model references bayesian estimation conditional-probability machine-learning optimization gradient-descent r hypothesis-testing wilcoxon-mann-whitney time-series bayesian inference change-point time-series anova repeated-measures statistical-significance bayesian contingency-tables regression prediction quantiles classification auc k-means scikit-learn regression spatial circular-statistics t-test effect-size cohens-d r cross-validation feature-selection caret machine-learning modeling python optimization frequentist correlation sample-size normalization group-differences heteroscedasticity independence generalized-least-squares lme4-nlme references mcmc metropolis-hastings optimization r logistic feature-selection separation clustering k-means normal-distribution gaussian-mixture kullback-leibler java spark-mllib data-visualization categorical-data barplot hypothesis-testing statistical-significance chi-squared type-i-and-ii-errors pca scikit-learn conditional-expectation statistical-significance meta-analysis intuition r time-series multivariate-analysis garch machine-learning classification data-mining missing-data cart regression cross-validation matrix-decomposition categorical-data repeated-measures chi-squared assumptions contingency-tables prediction binary-data trend test-for-trend matrix-inverse anova categorical-data regression-coefficients standard-error r distributions exponential interarrival-time copula log-likelihood time-series forecasting prediction-interval mean standard-error meta-analysis meta-regression network-meta-analysis systematic-review normal-distribution multiple-regression generalized-linear-model poisson-distribution poisson-regression r sas cohens-kappa
10
R lineare Regression kategoriale Variable "versteckter" Wert

Dies ist nur ein Beispiel, auf das ich mehrmals gestoßen bin, daher habe ich keine Beispieldaten. Ausführen eines linearen Regressionsmodells in R: a.lm = lm(Y ~ x1 + x2) x1ist eine stetige Variable. x2ist kategorisch und hat drei Werte, z. B. "Niedrig", "Mittel" und "Hoch". Die von R gegebene...

r regression categorical-data regression-coefficients categorical-encoding machine-learning random-forest anova spss r self-study bootstrap monte-carlo r multiple-regression partitioning neural-networks normalization machine-learning svm kernel-trick self-study survival cox-model repeated-measures survey likert correlation variance sampling meta-analysis anova independence sample assumptions bayesian covariance r regression time-series mathematical-statistics graphical-model machine-learning linear-model kernel-trick linear-algebra self-study moments function correlation spss probability confidence-interval sampling mean population r generalized-linear-model prediction offset data-visualization clustering sas cart binning sas logistic causality regression self-study standard-error r distributions r regression time-series multiple-regression python chi-squared independence sample clustering data-mining rapidminer probability stochastic-processes clustering binary-data dimensionality-reduction svd correspondence-analysis data-visualization excel c# hypothesis-testing econometrics survey rating composite regression least-squares mcmc markov-process kullback-leibler convergence predictive-models r regression anova confidence-interval survival cox-model hazard normal-distribution autoregressive mixed-model r mixed-model sas hypothesis-testing mediation interaction
10
Warum haben Anova () und drop1 () unterschiedliche Antworten für GLMMs geliefert?

Ich habe ein GLMM der Form: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Wenn ich benutze drop1(model, test="Chi"), erhalte ich andere Ergebnisse als wenn ich Anova(model, type="III")aus dem Autopaket oder benutze summary(model). Diese...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion
10
Maximal & häufig geschlossen - Antwort enthalten

My  dataset:My  dataset:My \ \ dataset: 1:A,B,C,E1:A,B,C,E1: A,B,C,E 2:A,C,D,E2:A,C,D,E2:A,C,D,E 3:     B,C,E3:     B,C,E3:\ \ \ \ \ B,C,E 4:A,C,D,E4:A,C,D,E4:A,C,D,E 5:    C,D,E5:    C,D,E5:\ \ \ \ C, D, E 6:    A,D,E6:    A,D,E6: \ \ \ \ A, D,E Ich möchte die maximal häufigen Objektgruppen und...

data-mining dataset association-rules